You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
[2/4] Yet the OPCW inspected Barzah twice in 2017--most recently last Nov--and found nothing out of the norm. In a report issued just in Mar. of this year, OPCW confirms the Syrian govt was cooperating in the process of demolishing the facility. (p.2 of https://www.opcw.org/fileadmin/OPCW/EC/87/en/ec87dg21_e_.pdf …)
[3/4] Of Syria's former 27 CW-related facilities, the Barzah and Jamrayah compounds were the last 2 standing (before last night). Deal in 2013 had all other declared facilities destroyed or decommissioned.
[4/4] So which is it? Was Barzah clean and set to be demolished with Syrian cooperation, or was it the heart of an ongoing rogue CW program?
@Kyaaale @scotthortonshow @LibertarianInst @ricksterling99 @MoonofA @Antiwarcom
Maybe one of you guys can set me straight if I'm missing something here. Is this not a discrepancy?
Barzah and Jamrayah were definitely not part of the 27. https://www.opcw.org/fileadmin/OPCW/S_series/2017/en/s-1541-2017_e_.pdf … One of them was “AL-MALIHA” RICIN PRODUCTION FACILITY https://www.opcw.org/fileadmin/OPCW/EC/M-46/ecm46dec01_e_.pdf … (can't find the doc for the other one)
[1/2] I think you may be right about this. In the docs I've been looking at, the OPCW consistently only refers to Barzah and Jamrayah by name. Then there's the "25 out of 27" wording. This led me to believe those WERE the same two.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
