We have a surplus of straight characters; we don't need to change gay ones for that purpose.
-
-
-
We don't need to change straight ones either irrespective of anything. Be who you are
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
THEY SHOULD STAY GAY AND HAPPY!
-
Tweet unavailable
-
The straight characters have always been happy. Never suppressed. So not really equality is it lmao
-
Seeing as their characters that don't technically exist I doubt any of them have been suppressed
-
The characters represent real people
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Neil Patrick Harris?
-
Character=\=actor
-
I classify actors to characters because they portray something they're not. Which is the career of acting.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
But there's a much smaller amount of gay characters than there are in the real world. But most characters could be gay and we just dont know
-
No, there's not "most characters could be gay". Going by actual norms there SHOULD be less gay characters.
-
Right. But it would be about 1 in 12, not 1 in 100.
-
It's nowhere near 1 in 12. In fact it's often over estimated in studies.
-
Between bi, asexual, trans, etc though, there's still far more LGBT+ in the world than there are characters.
-
I'm not debating that.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Lol because we have enough straight characters
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wowwww you posted 1 min ago and allready have 60 likes. I wait for an hour and get 2


Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
* bisexuality exists and is different than being gay
-
Maybe those straight characters were bi the whole time
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.