it's Biblically wrong & unnatural too.
-
-
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It's not,because its unnatural and in fact against nature as it opposes reproduction.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
From an evolutionary perspective that literally makes no sense. Gay animals don't reproduce so it literally has no affect on the gene pool.
-
if they did, that wouldn't be solving overpopulation. Not that overpopulation is an issue for animals, it's the result of a species success.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@KhandaniM overpopulation is a myth the entire world population could fit in france with the same density as in new york -
resources all of us need to live. Especially since as a whole, we're all polluting the Earth and scientists actually predict we will (2/3)
-
there is no lack of resources or anything for that matter unless you mean the lack of political will
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
-
That person that tries to sounds smart But NOOOOPEpic.twitter.com/vOOUZNnFl9
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If that is true, it's better than the alternative. (disease, etc)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Pondering on that now
@arpit1543Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It is...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nope, that's pandemics.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.