But a working clock could be off by two minutes and never be right
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's kind of the point of the saying.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think it's 2 out of 24 nd not 86400 and that's not that shitty
@TheWeirdWorld. Just a +ve thought -
The clock measures in seconds meaning it goes through 86400 phases and is only right 2 times....
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I never thought this topic would cause so much confusion. /facepalm
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's only if it includes a second hand
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Couldn't understand...
-
a day consists of 86400 secs..
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
How about if it's digital?
-
I didn't know digital clocks follow different rules of time.
-
Well digital would be correct just once a day
-
I guess you mean 24- hr clocks
-
That would be the point of a digital clock
-
Digital clocks can't be 12-hr clocks?
-
Sure, but a 12-hr clok wouldn't be an improvement over a traditional clock. Their strong point is that they can tell real (24-hr) time.
-
But technically even a wrong '24-hr digital clock' will be wrong twice as 1700 is still 5!
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
That's the fucking point.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think that's the idea of the statement.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.