That's kind of being dishonest. While it was mentioned in the decision, the decision relied more heavily on the 10th, that such protection is not a power given to the federal government, and thus belongs to the states under US law.
-
-
-
Although, as I understand it, if it was presented as a human right (bodily autonomy) applicable to both sexes, it would be something the Federal government could regulate. I think. The US system is difficult.
-
That might be the case, the US system definitely is strange. it's really hard to tell, without being a constitutional scholar, what the federal government truly can and cannot do. Distribution of powers feels kind of backward to me in the USA.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.