It's not on the level
-
-
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
It's not unprecedented. It is fairly common among ballot props.
-
3/5 or even 2/3 is more common. 7/8 is a high threshold
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Eh kinda. The legislature also has the ability to modify it as it sees fit so long as the modification is "consistent with the purpose" of the prop. There's some wiggle room here.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
This is going to be every bit as damaging as Proposition 13.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Majority rule is for the little people
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Need a CA legal expert on whether that would hold up in court, and how it measures against other restrictions that are allowed under CA law.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
People got duped. There are some things that just should not be dealt with via ballot initiative, and this is one of them.
-
90% of the stuff dealt with via ballot initiative should be dealt with through the state legislature (the other 10% is largely *fixing* previous bad initiatives) It's such a bad system
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Here's the thing, though: effectively *all* initiatives by default can't be overturned at *all* So paradoxically, this 7/8th provision, while awful, is *more* permissive than almost every initiative out there
-
Maybe it's designed to waste the time of state lawmakers on an unachievable goal. :-P
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.