That is censorship, and censorship for no good reason. Alex Jones and his fake news and conspiracies and hate speech needed to be censored, but discussing him is important and not the same thing as being him. Do better @TeamYouTube
What is interesting about monopolies is so long as they do not to some very specific actions they are legal to exist. Please correct me if I am wrong in understanding but your reference to tax breaks is the idea that the government has influence/control over the companies.
-
-
To comment towards this I would say no. Only because I recently learned of something called Soft Censorship. This is a 100% legal way for the government to influence business to change policy through, well, peer pressure.
-
This soft censorship can also come from other businesses and not just the government. Again, still 100% legal. It's very much food for thought. It's unknown if the government did do this soft censorship here.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
