Your complaint about lack of due process is legitimate. But the text of the letter does not represent what @TheOfficialACM stands for. You need to do more than explain the context ofthe letter; you need to withdraw ACM's signature from it.
-
-
-
Exactly - withdraw the signature. The letter is an embarrassment.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
This is nonsense: there is no connection between your "rationale" (due process) and the text of the letter you signed (that the OSTP proposal will "jeopardize the intellectual property of American organizations").
-
Do you stand by the statement in the letter that "the role of the publisher is to advance scholarship and innovation, fostering the American leadership in science that drives our economy and global competitiveness"? That's not what I thought ACM's role was.
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Would I be correct in concluding that as a non-American, ACM does not represent me in the same way? That is basically what your letter says
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Please withdraw your signature from that letter! There is no reasonable justification for siding against open access regulations. If you sympathize with the lack of due process, say so but stay out of that letter!
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
As a longtime member of ACM and an ACM Fellow, I’m offended by many things in this letter. Remove ACM’s signature from this letter!
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.