That's great. Why?
-
They *don't* have to, though. If they do, it's a good thing. If they don't, it's nothing but a missed opportunity. Just because my opinion isn't iron-clad enough to you to change your mind about it doesn't mean you have to talk down to me or imply that my *opinion* isn't sensible
It seems like I agree with you, I'm just emotionally charged right now. What I actually want to know is why it's wrong for me to think less of celebs who fail to speak on autism for fear of consequences, while openly doing far more controversial/consequential crap.
-
-
And I apologise for talking down to you, there was ambiguity in how to read your tweet, and I clearly chose the wrong way.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Maybe it just sounds wrong to think less of them for refusing to speak on it, because what they're really doing wrong is failing to justify that decision in a way that doesn't paint autism as worse (or otherwise less worth talking about) than any of the other shit they're doing.
-
That I completely agree with.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.