I feel like if I were a celebrity I wouldn't be as openly autistic as I am now, so I can't blame others for doing the same
-
-
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @druid249
I hate to challenge you, but: Why not? In such a position of privilege you would be less likely to suffer consequences for being open about being on the autism spectrum, not more likely. It's the little people like us who suffer for being open about it.
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @TheMogMiner ja @druid249
Their position of privilege isn't necessarily their fault. I wouldn't hold famous people to potentially unrealistic expectations... Don't tell other people whether or not it's "okay" for them to do something nice. It's made less nice by your expectation, anyway.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @ithinkitsflotts ja @druid249
Well, good news, I'm not tweeting at Stephen Spielberg or Dan Aykroyd and lambasting them for their lack of advocacy. I was asking a question and giving my own personal answer to the question. Maybe don't tell me what to do either, hon <3
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @TheMogMiner ja @druid249
Just giving my opinion. Sorry I offended you with my entirely rhetorical phrasing.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @ithinkitsflotts ja @druid249
Sorry my opinion seems to offend you so much as well. <3
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @TheMogMiner ja @druid249
I actually didn't even know where you stand. I had genuinely assumed that you were making a counter-argument for the sake of conversation, and that your own opinion was undecided. Otherwise, what was this post made for, other than to argue and send condescending emoticons? :P
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @ithinkitsflotts ja @druid249
Mainly, to get *sensible* arguments as to why celebrities might not want to jump up on an autism-advocacy soapbox. "Because they don't have to" is a tautology that seems kind of unreasonable.
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
In particular, I find the argument that "it could adversely impact their careers" to be spurious when suspected-autistic actors like Dan Aykroyd have no qualms about publicly announcing frankly bizarre crystal-skull shit, yet are silent on the subject of autism.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Sure, everyone is more than welcome to say everything or say nothing on the subject of being on the autism spectrum, but when I see people who are suspected of being on the spectrum doing crazy career-imploding shit when they could be doing something net-positive, it kinda sucks.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä
Like to go back to Aykroyd, it's like, "Hey, I could promote this shitty vodka in a crystal skull, or I could advocate for people who are potentially like me." He's free to make that decision, but I'm free to think that one choice is manifestly shittier than the other.
-
-
And what I want, what I want is a justification as to why one choice might be taken over the other, other than the purely solipsistic "Fuck you, I do what I want".
0 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystäKiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.