That's great. Why?
-
In particular, I find the argument that "it could adversely impact their careers" to be spurious when suspected-autistic actors like Dan Aykroyd have no qualms about publicly announcing frankly bizarre crystal-skull shit, yet are silent on the subject of autism.
Sure, everyone is more than welcome to say everything or say nothing on the subject of being on the autism spectrum, but when I see people who are suspected of being on the spectrum doing crazy career-imploding shit when they could be doing something net-positive, it kinda sucks.
-
-
Like to go back to Aykroyd, it's like, "Hey, I could promote this shitty vodka in a crystal skull, or I could advocate for people who are potentially like me." He's free to make that decision, but I'm free to think that one choice is manifestly shittier than the other.
-
And what I want, what I want is a justification as to why one choice might be taken over the other, other than the purely solipsistic "Fuck you, I do what I want".
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.