![apple ][ europlus](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1892063656/image_normal.jpg)
That doesn't seem sensible, though. If it's possible to get a "sample good/no-good" signal from the pickup, then surely at least the capturing can be done now, and what amounts to the SDR end of things to convert the raw signal to an image can be done later, yes?
I've heard rumors that some move archival enthusiasts have developed Laserdisc capture hardware which samples RF directly off the laser pickup, for theoretically-ideal capture quality. Anyone know if there's any truth to that, and how to get in touch with such a person if so?
-
-
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
I guess that's where we disagree. Personally, I consider "known good dump produced by multiple discs" to be a better situation than the "ghastly MPEG encodes of a single disc run through a capture card with external text files representing the VBI data" situation we have now.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
That seems unlikely to yield noticeably better results than just playing the disk on a high-quality player and capturing the composite video output. (Unlike video tape "color under", Laserdisc directly records composite video. No benefit to s-video output.)
-
It's not a matter of results being *visibly* better. It's that if a player has a good/no-good signal from the pickup for any given sample read off the disc, the data can be *provably good*, and a known-to-be-perfect dump can be merged from reads off multiple discs.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.