Like, I've just never been particularly enthusiastic about what I've got going on below the waistline, and have wanted all that crap gone for as long as I can remember. Am I somehow not non-binary just because I don't want to wear a dress? Excuse?
-
Näytä tämä ketju
-
Am I not enby because I don't want to have full GRS, just yeet what's there and go on a maintenance dose of T to prevent bone density loss, and have wanted that for decades? Clothing is just something I wear to not get arrested in public, it's a fucking hassle.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 6 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
And from all of the women I've known in my life, all of the women I follow on Twitter, I get first-hand accounts of what a colossal pain in the ass womens' clothing is, and this doctor at ANOVA is suggesting I dabble in CD? Where did she get her medical degree, fucking DeVry?
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 4 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
And who the hell decided that it's a 1-dimensional axis in the first place, "male" on one end, "female" on the other, and a Munch-esque chariacture of both, generated by a poorly-coded GAN running on an overheating AWS server right in the middle, and only THAT is non-binary?
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Like have I just gone completely out of my goddamn mind, or is the reality that we are, each of us, the total sum of many different axes, from how we present ourselves physically or socially, to how we think of ourselves mentally, and so many other things that make you *you*?
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @TheMogMiner
short answer, no, and yes. Categorization/generalization are really powerful tools, including the power to convince people that because they know one thing about someone, they know many things (and they might be right! but not always or even often)
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @0x56 ja @TheMogMiner
sometimes things are really complicated, and it’s valid for them to just be what they are, and categories are harmful and counterproductive
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @0x56
I'm happy for things to "just be what they are", but when I have a doctor who's giving me facile thought experiments that I've long thought through, on a self-related topic I've been clear on for 20+ years now, rather than taking me at my word and going forward, it's a bit much.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @TheMogMiner ja @0x56
Beyond that, it's not clear what part of my diatribe you're agreeing with and what part you're not, so that's all I can say. Because 'the assumption that you know one thing about someone leading to assumptions about knowing other things' is what the damn doctor is doing, not me.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @TheMogMiner
sorry for any lack of clarity, I’m attempting to agree with you, that the doctor is fucking this up by generalizing. Your reaction seems extremely appropriate to me
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys
Thanks for clarifying. To an extent, I *want* to agree with the doctor. Any major surgery needs to be done with the utmost forethought, and I could just as easily be lying to her. But this needs to be accounted for in some way other than putting people through further hell.
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.