A Moogle  🏳️‍🌈 💻 🎮 🎶 🇸🇪

Then: Street Fighter II: Hyper Fighting. Sorry? Ryu literally hurls balls of directional fucking energy, Blanka has the ability to shoot lighting out of his back. Is there something about the first couple games I missed that doesn't make them hyper enough already?

Then, "Super Street Fighter II". Isn't that a step backwards, Capcom? You're ratcheting the hype to "Hyper", but maybe it's too much. Maybe players' heads were exploding like Scanners in arcades when seeing the marquee of "Hyper Fighting". Okay, fine, let's walk it back a little.

Then, as far as the "II" series goes, there's finally "Super Street Fighter II Turbo" - How exactly do I align these two particular attributes? What part of it is "Super" and what part of it is "Turbo"?

Now we get to 1996, when the already crazy lay of the titular land with Street Fighter ceases to be a car driving down a highway. It instantly veers 90 degrees, crashing through the guard-rail of normality, and starts trundling cross-country through the fields of batfuck.

In 1996, Street Fighter EX, the first properly 3D take on the series. Fair enough, perhaps "Street Fighter 3D" would have been too obvious, or perhaps it would have conveyed some threequel nature of the series that it didn't have at the time.

Then in 1997, we see the release of "Street Fighter EX Plus" - plus? Plus what? There is no right-hand value for this operation. Capcom, what are you doing? Capcom, please.

The very same year, Capcom releases an ACTUAL threequel to the game, "Street Fighter III: New Generation". Now we're back to a vague sense of normalcy again. They considerably revise the line-up of fighters, so it makes some sense. This normalcy in naming will not last.

Later in 1997? "Street Fighter III 2nd Impact: Giant Attack". Giant Attack?! What, everyone is 30m tall and they're kicking buildings instead of each other? I can think of worse things than macro Zangief in his thong, but no, we're not that lucky, it's just a threequel sequel.