Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
To an extent, the outwardly visible difference I see is that while developers don't ultimately control how a project is covered, they can be upfront about misleading coverage. But from the outside looking in, the attitude seems more to be "Hey, any promotional port in a storm."
The stated goal of MAME, for example, is to be as accurate as possible. Is that the case for the *vast* majority of drivers supported? Absolutely not. And if some coverage claimed it to be, it would be MAME developers expressing dismay that it was portrayed as such.
As a whole, the PC-based emulation community points out flaws *often*. The FPGA-based emulation community circles the wagons and exhibits a nearly religious level of indignation at the suggestion that not *all* FPGA emulation is Furrtek/Jotego/kevtris levels of accurate.
If FPGA emulation was perfect there wouldn't be any bug fix commits in the github repos.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
