Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
I adore the amount of effort that's being put into FPGA-based emulation. If it weren't for that, 1942 would *still* have a broken title screen in MAME. There's nothing inherently bad with FPGA-based emulation itself. But the way it tends to be promoted leans on half-truths.
To an extent, the outwardly visible difference I see is that while developers don't ultimately control how a project is covered, they can be upfront about misleading coverage. But from the outside looking in, the attitude seems more to be "Hey, any promotional port in a storm."
The stated goal of MAME, for example, is to be as accurate as possible. Is that the case for the *vast* majority of drivers supported? Absolutely not. And if some coverage claimed it to be, it would be MAME developers expressing dismay that it was portrayed as such.
As a whole, the PC-based emulation community points out flaws *often*. The FPGA-based emulation community circles the wagons and exhibits a nearly religious level of indignation at the suggestion that not *all* FPGA emulation is Furrtek/Jotego/kevtris levels of accurate.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
