Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
No. But if the verilog was derived from a chip decap it is.
If that information is plugged into an emulator running on a PC, you now have an emulator with the same level of accuracy. People treating FPGA emulation like some kind of religion act as if it's accomplishing something PC-based emulators *can't* do, and that's not the case.
Quite a number of drivers in MAME exhibit accuracy flaws that are there not because they *can't* be solved, but that they *haven't* been solved. It's like trying to claim SNES emulation is terrible by comparing a real SNES to ZSNES when Higan is a fucking thing now.
Yet the FPGA crowd like to act as if it's a "can't" situation rather than a "hasn't yet been", situation - and the people working on FPGA-based emulators, for the most part, are going closed-source in order to actively *prevent* open emulators from getting at helpful info.
The emulation could be perfect on either or could be completely botched on either. One thing a PC can't do is reduce the latency to zero.
And I'm happy to suggest FPGA-based emulation as a solution to that. But this woo-woo "magically accurate" crap is the technical equivalent of MMS or Jilly Juice, and can fuck right off. Functional accuracy comes from effort, it's not an inherent aspect of the solution.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
