Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Given an appropriate amount of effort, the outputs from an FPGA for a given set of inputs can be made to be indistinguishable from actual hardware, given enough effort. But that effort still needs to be made. You get very little for free.
Put another way: All sorts of tricks can be done to minimize die space on a silicon chip, potentially by re-using gates or other things. Even one step above transistors, an FPGA still does not re-create that exact configuration of gates. It still just re-creates the *behavior*.
![[ColeJ]](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1043000626056065024/vDRPnUpt_normal.jpg)
trading in mister for pi thanks kupo
I can't stop you, but if that's your take-away, then I have to make it clear at this point that I would much rather see people running MiSTer cores for classic arcade games than some castrated, shat-on version of MAME running through RetroPie.
Having programmed some VHDL in an FPGA course a long time ago, I find them very interesting and useful tools, but as all tools, they have their proper place and usage. Your last description there really nails it, in my opinion!
I agree except for games, like pong, without microprocessor, based on HW logic. There is a nice MISTER FPGA emulation, and that's "true emulation"
You can say that, but you'd still be wrong. MAME has a SPICE-grade netlist solver for handling circuits without microprocessors, too. It can also handle analog audio boards for early arcade games that FPGAs can't. You people still use recorded samples. Quit your bullshit.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
