what would you add to IRC, theoretically speaking? I feel like anything that takes it away from text-through-a-socket would be straying from the point, but I'm interested to hear your thoughts.
I'm not going to lie: I really would adore seeing a new generation of the IRC protocol. Maybe I'm weird. Actually, I know I'm weird. But I have more positive and longer-lasting memories of time spent on IRC even into the 2000's than any other chat program.
-
-
-
This is an admittedly naïve take, but things like embedding images, watchable YouTube links, and other things could conceivably be done with the existing protocol, if only clients implemented a boilerplate level of parsing links posted by other people.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
I kinda feel the same way about MUCKs, the furry ones in particular.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Maybe I'm weird too, but why not use XMPP? It can do all these nice things, and is not too complex.
-
I can't fault XMPP, it does everything it needs to do (including awesome bridge support) . I was big on it in the mid 2000's (even running my own openfire server) and yet matrix is now more popular and I haven't fired up XMPP in like 20 years.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.