A Moogle  🏳️‍🌈 💻 🎮 🎶 🇸🇪

Let's talk about the orthogonality between "we support digital preservation" and "we don't support piracy", as I understand it from looking back on the history of MAME.

I would hope that we can agree that piracy within the context of brand new games, done by people who could easily afford the games, is distasteful. If you don't agree, hey, fine, but please read onward.

I have a hard time believing that there's anyone out there under the age of I don't know, 35, 40 or so, who doesn't have at least one fond memory of playing a game in an arcade, being mesmerized by the quality of graphics and audio. I was there, I know it well.

In a given arcade, how many of those games did you actually play? How many of them did other people play? Apart from outliers, how many of those games were actually fondly remembered by, well, anyone?

To put it into perspective: A quick grep through the MAME codebase indicates nearly 22 thousand instances of the GAME() macro, which is used solely by pinball machines, electromechanical games, and arcade games - exactly the ones that would be in an arcade. How many can you name?

Now, to tie it back to the original point: How many of those games, do you think, had archives of the game's data kept by the company that created them? More broadly, how many of those companies even still exist?

What I can tell you is that that number is alarmingly closer to zero than the average person might expect. Even major companies like Namco, Sega, Konami, Taito, Capcom and others had abysmal archival practices. How do we know this? Read on.

In the early 2000's, both Konami and Taito issued retro arcade compilations on the PlayStation 2. One of them clearly used a build of MAME, based on unique string identifiers. Another used ROM sets that were clearly originally dumped for MAME. But how do we know that?