Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Moreover, I'm equally sure that the EFF *wouldn't* step in here. Nearly every article I've seen seems to conflate the idea of decompiler-based reverse-engineering with *clean-room* reverse-engineering. The legal implications between the two are wildly different.
The well-established case of Compaq reverse-engineering the IBM PC BIOS for their own machine, involved clean-room RE. A team of programmers disassembled the BIOS and documented each function in a technical document describing inputs, outputs, and calculations.
Meanwhile, a separate team of programmers, not communicating with those with "unclean hands", used this document to create a brand new BIOS from scratch - functionally identical, but with the resulting being verifiably created by people who had not looked at the copyrighted code.
The team reverse-engineering the GTA3 engine, on the other hand, are taking a more direct approach: Examining output from a decompiler/disassembler and directly re-creating a C equivalent. That "bridge" over the legal river is nonexistent in this case.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
