Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Part of that missunderstanding comes from people not realizing that the assets of retro games are not very scaleable in their raw form and then try to create "more detail" via a "clean image" when all they're doing is removing post processing needed for the art to scale.
Yes, and along those same lines, you wind up with people who use upscalers, anything from the old-and-moldy SuperEagle/2xSAI to more modern upscalers that still, at the end of the day, are trying to do an end run around the fact that that information just isn't there.
They go "Wow, this looks great, I'm sure it's what the developers would have intended," when gee, I dunno, but I think artists doing hand-wrought art could probably make better use of the added resolution than something that makes everything look like a watercolor painting.
If someone enjoys playing games like that, I can't say they shouldn't, nor someone using RetroPie and an old version of MAME lacking the 100+ of fixes for major classics from the past 15+ years. It's when "Wow, I like this!" becomes "Wow, this is authentic!" that it's a problem.
Yeah, it's a lot like disabling all post processing features and shaders for a modern videogame. At the end of the day a emulated retro game with the proper video signal shader still looks nice on large modern UHD displays. Same goes for 32 bit 3D games too in a lot of instances.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
