And I know part of the answer and could certainly research more into it but this is an area where I'm interested in how people interpret it.
-
Näytä tämä ketju
-
So, did Jesus get punished by the Romans because he'd been doing stuff against their laws and they finally nailed him (NO PUN INTENDED) for it? Or did he get sent down for a crime he didn't commit?
9 vastausta 3 uudelleentwiittausta 69 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
And for the purposes of this question I don't really care if he was divine or not. The question is presumably the same even if he was just a normal mortal guy who was going around sermonizing about a new flavor of Judaism he just invented, and got killed and stayed dead.
5 vastausta 1 uudelleentwiittaus 53 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Unless you think specifically what the Romans charged him with was Doing Magic. Maybe they had a law against healing the sick and making the blind see and exploiting item duplication bugs to make too much fish and bread
10 vastausta 7 uudelleentwiittausta 116 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Another way to look at it is to question what you think Judas did. Did he frame Jesus, and due to the terrible state of the justice system of occupied Judea, Jesus was executed for it?
3 vastausta 1 uudelleentwiittaus 48 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Or did he turn in a known criminal who had broken some Roman law? So legally fine, just presumably not ethically, in the "it is just to disobey an unjust law" sense.
4 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 49 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
To be clear I'm not asking "what's the scholarly/'correct' answer". I have Google, I can research that myself. I'm asking how you interpret it from Sunday school or movies or whatever
6 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 30 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @Foone
OK as a teen I was in a Way of the Cross play at my church as Pilate. Pilate wanted to give a slap on the wrist and let Jesus go. Only laws broken were Hebrew laws not Roman. J wouldn't play along "It is you who say I am" "give to Caesar what is Caesar's" and all that.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
The prosecutor is right there going "he said he's king and won't deny it" really needling Pilate into it. You get the whole "I wash my hands of this" "take him yourself and crucify him" then Barabbas, lashes, and the cross.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
The whole time J coulda went "I'm no king. Sorry for the misunderstanding." and got off with a night in the clink. Even up on the cross he could have gone "Dad, get me down from here. This sucks." But he didn't. So there you go. That's Jesus for you I guess.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys
If he did, his actions would not have had as long-lasting of an impact. It would not have been as apparent to the more general public that he was being persecuted, as opposed to prosecuted. This is as relevant today as it was then, with people choosing prosecution over silence.
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.