So, did Jesus get punished by the Romans because he'd been doing stuff against their laws and they finally nailed him (NO PUN INTENDED) for it? Or did he get sent down for a crime he didn't commit?
-
Näytä tämä ketju
-
And for the purposes of this question I don't really care if he was divine or not. The question is presumably the same even if he was just a normal mortal guy who was going around sermonizing about a new flavor of Judaism he just invented, and got killed and stayed dead.
5 vastausta 1 uudelleentwiittaus 53 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Unless you think specifically what the Romans charged him with was Doing Magic. Maybe they had a law against healing the sick and making the blind see and exploiting item duplication bugs to make too much fish and bread
10 vastausta 7 uudelleentwiittausta 116 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Another way to look at it is to question what you think Judas did. Did he frame Jesus, and due to the terrible state of the justice system of occupied Judea, Jesus was executed for it?
3 vastausta 1 uudelleentwiittaus 48 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Or did he turn in a known criminal who had broken some Roman law? So legally fine, just presumably not ethically, in the "it is just to disobey an unjust law" sense.
4 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 49 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
To be clear I'm not asking "what's the scholarly/'correct' answer". I have Google, I can research that myself. I'm asking how you interpret it from Sunday school or movies or whatever
6 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 30 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Like if you met up with an old friend in a bar in Nazareth around AD 35 and the friend goes "man, what do about that Jesus trial?" How do you consider it? Was he punished for breaking a Roman (or other) law? Or was it all trumped up charges and he was innocent?
6 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 35 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @Foone
Growing up Catholic, this is my understanding (and hopefully
@ZacMabry can correct me on any points I miss here): The whole point is that he was persecuted unjustly. Someone in AD35 pointing out that he shouldn't have been executed would have been a minority voice, but correct.1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
As I see it, if we put aside the whole concept of Jesus literally fulfilling his predetermined destiny at that point, it provides a very real learning point, which is that one person standing up to suffer an injustice can provide salvation for everyone.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
There's a practical disconnect where people who do not believe will laugh and go "Oh, so 'cos Jesus died, our lives are amazing?" but that misses the fundamental point: A visible injustice levied against one person can provide the outrage necessary to prevent further injustices..
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystä
Think of it this way - had He never been crucified, the whole conversation in a Roman pub of "Hey, Ares, I'm just saying, but maybe that whole fiasco shouldn't have ever happened" would never have occurred.
-
-
And this is the point where I break from both Catholics and Christians in general - because I do not believe in literalism. Purely on its face, it is a valuable life lesson that doing the upright thing does not always result in a particularly great life, applicable to anyone.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
"Feed the hungry, heal the sick, help the poor" should not be a particularly revolutionary idea, but for all too many it is, and someone who devotes their life to doing so should logically expect no end of persecution for it. It should not be that way, but it is.
0 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.