What's the best way of getting into preserving/modeling video output devices, without ending up going down the video equivalent of the audiophile snake-oil woo path?
-
-
It can be mathematically verified, but it'll look wildly different depending on if you're tapping RGB signals directly on a logic analyzer, versus a PVM over S-Video, or a consumer TV over composite, or any number of output devices.
Näytä tämä ketju -
The amount of tweakability in e.g. CGWG's shaders are great, but it's still an idealized model. How do I go from where we are, to "Give me this console as seen on a terrible 1970's Zenith set with poor vertical deflection"?
Näytä tämä ketju -
I want to accurately model this or that display device, with this or that fault mode, but I don't want to go down the path of buying rare jungle-wood discs to put my receiver on for more "body", or buying gold-plated S/PDIF cables for more "warmth", as audiophiles do.
Näytä tämä ketju -
To an extent it feels like chasing illusions, because even with the best shader, and the most accurate model of a given TV set or monitor's circuitry, the color gamut is just *different* on flat panels vs. CRTs.
Näytä tämä ketju
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Well, for systems that produced a composite or a svideo signal we should probably generate it, then have a nice tunable decoder. Which, as you've already proven, is doable on the gpu too.
-
Definitely, but even then - it's still an idealized, general-purpose model. The circuitry in a given display device still imparts some level of characteristic on the final output, it's not just a property of the tube itself.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.