Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Per the explanation that I read, it amounted to something along the lines of examining the KPI for a specific change, i.e.: A: Raising the value of in-game Widgets from X to Y results in +0.5% ARPPU. B: Raising the value of in-game Widgets from X to Z results in +0.75% ARPPU.
If that's the case, though, where do control groups fit in? Based solely on the sorts of user-experience-damaging changes that companies like Twitter appear to make in such a blithe manner, is there any consideration given to other, less measurable effects?
I’ve observed its really hard to know the impact of a test on things that can’t be measured. User research is supposed to cover that, but is often stretched thin. It helps that flighting info is usually recorded with every interaction, including support/feedback requests
Sorry, "flighting info"?
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
