I keep seeing this tweet about how hyper-independence is a sign of abuse. And I agree with it, but I'm not sure how to internalize it. I've been wanting to start a video series doing short docus on the history of various emulators, but I pretty much *have* to do it myself.
-
Näytä tämä ketju
-
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @TheMogMiner
I'm not sure I'd say abuse, although maybe over-compensation. I struggle to be independent in many ways others manage just fine, so in my own way I balance that out by not relying on others in different ways.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 3 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @MameHaze ja @TheMogMiner
Also there's a certain autistic element to it I think, social burnout - bringing more people on board means having to manage more unpredictable things, not let other people down if things don't work out. Again a lot of it is just trying to prevent becoming overloaded with that.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @MameHaze ja @TheMogMiner
I've seen this misinterpreted too often as ego, not thinking anybody else is worthy etc. and only believing in myself, but it's not that at all. For a lot of the tasks I take on I'd consider myself to be far less suited than 95% of the rest of the team.
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 4 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @MameHaze ja @TheMogMiner
There's also the focus element. Switching between tasks is expensive for me, and while I do this a lot already, again it's about management. Look at the whole MAME/MESS merger, before I didn't do much for MESS because that focus shift to another application was too much.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 3 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @MameHaze ja @TheMogMiner
I'm not going to say these aren't in some way character flaws, because they are, but they're things I've found ways to deal with that work to the level I need them to work. Pushing beyond them does quickly burn me out however.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @MameHaze
In that case, I'm curious, what is it about clear-cut commit messages that is the draining factor? I'm not trying to call you out here, I just know that this has been a source of friction, and I'm wondering how the process might be streamlined to be more inclusive.
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @TheMogMiner
Honestly, I'm not even sure. Some combination of internal dialog "make sense to me" and focus "I'll summarize this later" mixed with "I don't have 100% confidence right now, so writing too much might just be misleading" It's not something I've thought too much about. Brainflow?
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @MameHaze
This hits home with me, really. Perhaps it's just that you need someone to look at the changes and write a concise summary, in the sense that you might be too mentally attached to the minutiae to be able to summarize it?
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @TheMogMiner
That's possible, and Github even seems to allow for that; I'm seeing a lot of edited commit messages to the point it seems to be an acknowledged thing even outside of MAME as the systems are in place to allow the repository owners / people merging PRs to do that.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä
Could just be that you should let certain folks know when you're about to send a PR. so we can prepare a relevant squash-commit message.
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.