Sorry, I only saw the initial screenshot in the thread, not the subsequent tweets. That said: The jailbars seem to be about 1 cycle per tile. That's far lower than any signal that'd be getting thrown around the Famicom's internal buses. Tuned properly, it could work.
-
-
I was thinking more along the lines of something that could be connected in-line with the Famicom's video output in order to mute the jailbar effect. Given the NTSC color burst frequency, notching out a frequency of 1 cycle per tile shouldn't affect the eventual output.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
From what I can tell, the SRAM seems to be parasitically pulling a couple milliamps off of the the bus, which leads to cycles of voltage dropping (increased luma) across the raster, one per nametable square at the beginning - corresponding with nametable CIRAM fetch by the PPU.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @sirocyl, @TheMogMiner ja
Perhaps the most noninvasive strategy involving the output signal would be to introduce a comb filter instead of a notch filter, tuned in such a way to repeat the low-frequency luma component in the pre-bar zone in the raster but not the high-frequency chroma subcarrier.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
I believe in fixing the issue at the source, by providing the ICs all the current they need even when they pump like crazy using carefully chosen capacitor values and placement?
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 5 tykkäystä -
Same opinion. I don't get how a filter on the final output would hide the problem without affecting the useful signal in some way or the other. What if a game wants to display something similar to the jailbars ?
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystä -
If the premise is that my suggestion is shit and my knowledge is shit, maybe try to educate me rather than just humiliating me. As a leftist, this makes me understand how are baffled that the right don't just latch onto the left's brilliant ideas when you openly mock them.
3 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Wtf ?
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
My point is that your responses seem to broadly revolve around laughing at me for being "wrong", rather than explaining what concepts I'm actually getting wrong here. Educate me, don't mock me.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Uh... are you alright ? Feels like I'm missing something here.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä
It's probably more that I've misinterpreted the tone behind your replies to my tweets. That's how it goes with text-based communication. All I wanted was to try to help, but the responses seem to revolve around the fact that my suggestions were wrong, not *how* they were wrong.
-
-
Vastauksena käyttäjille @TheMogMiner, @furrtek ja
I'd rather learn through definite examples as to why my suggestion wouldn't work, rather than what I have perceived as "Get a load of this guy, he thought this would work - ha!"
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @TheMogMiner, @furrtek ja
Essentially: If I'm wrong, tell me exactly how and why I'm wrong, and I'll absolutely thank you for it, because I'll have been able to learn something. There's no shame in being wrong, only shame in being wrong and not learning how to be correct.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä - Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.