Who gets to decide what is "press" and what is "free"? To me, the only thing that really needs revising in the US is its concept of defamation (slander/libel). Drawing down on defamation law would handily tighten things on both sides of the aisle.
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
NY Post is owned by News Corp, which was founded by Rupert Murdoch. The rest is clearly opinion. Not just opinion, but a hyperbolic, too, which throws it even more into the clear, defamation-wise. At what point can corporate executives not hold opinions?
Quite frankly, if that's really the nuance of your objection - that someone who works for a large company shouldn't be able to hold a negative opinion about something - then I have to ask, isn't it us on the left who are supposed to be the snowflakes?
-
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
If you want to argue that the heightened scrutiny for public figures under defamation law shouldn't exist, then I'm right there with you. But what you're doing right now is conflating two separate issues. 1A is unrelated to defamation.
- Näytä vastaukset
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.