Strange, I've read it multiple times and I can't see where OP says anything about whether or not the NY Post should or shouldn't exist, simply states an opinion. One which you can do what you like with.
Who gets to decide what is "press" and what is "free"? To me, the only thing that really needs revising in the US is its concept of defamation (slander/libel). Drawing down on defamation law would handily tighten things on both sides of the aisle.
-
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
You're conflating two issues. Freedom of press isn't freedom to defame. The issue here is that it's become arbitrary, and not fully litigated or codified into law, what exactly a "public figure" is. Or, for that matter, why there should be heightened scrutiny for such cases.
- Näytä vastaukset
-
-
-
Just my personal take, but I can't stand the fact that there is an arbitrarily heightened bar for defamation when it comes to a "public figure". Maybe that meant something in the 1700's, but what does it mean now? Is a blue-check on Twitter a "public figure"?
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.