It's honestly impressive how well Motorola 68000 assembly is both A) able to be manually reversed into C-like code, and B) understandable, even having never touched 68k ASM before in my life.
-
-
-
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @LuigiThirty
I'm not sure I really *love* any CPU architecture other than perhaps SPARC. But they all have their warts, even SPARC. Still, I appreciate how easy 68k is to reverse-engineer. I'd be up a creek without a paddle with regard to the CD-i's CDIC otherwise.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @TheMogMiner ja @LuigiThirty
I could absolutely talk your ear off about SPARC, though. It's the closest thing to a perfect set of opcodes that I've ever seen. It's light and streamlined, with an abundance of synthetic opcodes that can be constructed from a relatively small handful of real instructions.
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystä
The whole register-windowing part of the SPARC architecture was hot garbage, but the IU's instruction set, at least, was absolutely beautiful.
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.