Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
1/ Sadly, Quizard 3 and 4 still fail the same way with low-level protection emulation as they do with the protection sim. This points the finger squarely at the base CD-i emulation itself, as there are various home titles that fail remarkably similarly.
2/ The long and short of it is that both games fail when trying to go in-game, most likely due to faults in the CDIC emulation. The CDIC sits in between the main CPU and all disc and audio-sample accesses, so it's the keeper of the keys.
3/ Unfortunately, the CDIC most likely includes a gate array and some other things for which documentation is entirely nonexistent. Worse still, the average emulator-writing solution of "throw different games at it, see how they interact with it differently" doesn't apply.
4/ The CD-i accomplished something that only the advent of the Xbox 360 and PS3 brought back again: A base spec, with all published titles hitting the hardware through documented OS calls. Different models of CD-i players vary wildly in the underlying hardware.
5/ The result is that you can throw all the games you want at your emulator, you're still only going to be seeing one set of access patterns. Even worse, the OS typically wedges itself a few CDIC accesses *after* something it doesn't like, making diagnosis difficult.
6/ This weekend I managed to at least get Quizard 3 and 4 to go in-game, but they then hang after your answer the first question. This one I'm *really* stumped on.pic.twitter.com/rxSD6Lm89C
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
