Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
The simple fact is that the demand for quality assets has increased, while gamers' ability to visualize these assets at the intended quality has increased commensurately as well, leading to double the motivation to avoid lossy compression, and increase asset size.
As much as I hate to be the bearer of bad news, it isn't 2001 anymore, and the average particle system won't look particularly compelling with PS2-era texture resolutions and polygon counts. But fortunately, we don't live in that world anymore, constrained by 32 meg of RAM.
I hate to sound flippant - I do - but you need to consider the fact that even a mid-range graphics card these days has multiple gigabytes of VRAM, which directly translates to multiple gigabytes of assets - for *one* *scene*. How many scenes does an average epic title have?
As hardware capacity increases, software demands increase to fill capacity. That's the world we live in. That's the world we've lived in for decades. But people not involved in the creation of such software decry "wasteful" use of resources without having the full context.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
