Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Animations can certainly be compressed - when dealing with rigs that are animated with forward kinematics, those optimisations come at the cost of jitter which is increasibly noticeable as render resolutions go up.
Textures can be optimised by running them through compression schemes like DXT1, DXT5, BC6 or BC7 - but you'd better hope that those textures don't need hard edges or otherwise require fine details, because the block compression utilised by all of the above will kill quality.
Audio tracks can be compressed, at the cost of noticeable levels of hiss or atrocious levels of frequency response, which is particularly unforgivable given the number of gamers who use headsets these days.
The simple fact is that the demand for quality assets has increased, while gamers' ability to visualize these assets at the intended quality has increased commensurately as well, leading to double the motivation to avoid lossy compression, and increase asset size.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
