@VisualStudio I know some of your devs are all about using emulators as test cases, so can I ask on behalf of us at @mamedev_org why you haven't adopted MAME has a standard test case yet? It's hit C++1x, template, and ICE bugs left and right since late in the VS2017 cycle.
-
Näytä tämä ketju
-
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @TheMogMiner
Hi again, Ryan! There is no reticence. We do plan to add new codebases to our real-world code test matrix and MAME could be a good candidate to consider for our next iteration. Thank you also for helping us improve our compiler through the issues you have submitted so far!
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 4 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @VisualStudio
That's awesome to hear! For what it's worth, MAME is a pretty brutal test of templates and C++1x support, and it's uncovered bugs in many compilers. I only raised the issue to you good folks, specifically, as it's getting inordinately difficult to remain compilable with MSVC.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @TheMogMiner ja @VisualStudio
Which, for what it's worth, is not meant to throw shade at MSVC or its team, it's just an unfortunate reality. I absolutely adore Visual Studio, it's my go-to debugger. It's just tough to debug MAME under Visual Studio when I can't compile under it.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @TheMogMiner ja @VisualStudio
Thank you :), once we have MAME building clean in our test suite, we can help with removing the workarounds in place for MSVC as needed.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys
Thank you so much! You have no idea how happy that makes me and the rest of the Windows-based devs at @mamedev_org . If there is anything we can do to help drill down on isolated test cases, just give me a shout. :)
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.