Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Hot take: Steam got popular because people were sick of the late 90's / early 00's crap-fest where every publisher hamfistedly tried to shove their own garbage proprietary launcher down gamers' throats. That hasn't changed. Stop trying it, you corporate half-wits.
Let's also not forget that Steam was widely despised for its first few years of existence, because until Valve managed to sign a wide array of third-party content, it was just another proprietary launcher.
Now, I'm not necessarily saying that companies shouldn't try to create a product to compete with Steam; in fact, if Epic can sign more studios, their launcher has great potential. But all the rest just reek of shamelessly trying to squeeze gamers for even more cash.
This is confusing lol Your first post seems pretty anti-Epic Launcher. But then your second post seems to imply folks should just give it time, especially since Epic has already gotten 3rd parties. Not trying to argue. Just saying these two posts seem at odds
Epic Launcher is actually the only one that I think stands a chance. But UPlay, Origin, all the rest just seem like the end result of a non-gamer, MBA-sporting executive's weekend coke binge.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
