Let's air the most basic flaw with this method first: You're making dumps that are ostensibly a single merged file, representing not just the contents of potentially more than one individual ROM chip, but the data post-processed by any potential on-cart memory mappers.
-
-
Fact is, not all games had the entire contents of the cartridge on one single IC. In fact, I would wager my next paycheck that a fair few do not. They're split across multiple chips.
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Worse still, different cartridges had different ways of mapping the contents of these ICs onto a given console's bus. Doing a straight-up read of addresses 0 to N can't and won't give you the full contents of the cartridge in any one of numerous rare edge cases.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
What this tells me, more than anything, is that you folks are only interested in backing up the more popular games, the more common games, the ones that are largely in little jeopardy of being lost to bit-rot in the first place.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @TheMogMiner ja @museumofplay
It's important to keep in mind that this is one tool out of a growing toolbox. Every tool can have its use case. We're not afraid to dump ROMs. I would actually say it's the opposite: we're more worried about those in jeopardy of being lost to bit-rot, which is why we prioritize.
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystä -
We've been focusing largely on our at-risk media. We embarked on a pilot project of dumping 100 floppy disks with a Kryoflux, which quickly expanded to dumping over 1700. These aren't retail floppy disks either, these are strictly from our archives.
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @Borman18 ja @museumofplay
I really hate to so consistently be That Guy (believe me, I do), but isn't the Kryoflux ostensibly a closed-source solution that relies on closed-source tools and proprietary formats, where there are equivalent tools that are far more open?
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @TheMogMiner ja @museumofplay
Again, the Kryoflux is a tool, but is unfortunately one of the ones that makes sense. right now We also have an Applesauce, which unfortunately didn't exist and was one of the limitations that I highlighted with the Kryoflux.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @Borman18 ja @museumofplay
That's fair. On a similar note, have you all been in contact with the Domesday '86 people re: preserving laserdiscs? They've developed a 100% open-source solution, the Domesday Duplicator, which effectively captures laserdiscs as high-quality as physically possible.
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @TheMogMiner ja @museumofplay
I've been following it closely. I'm just waiting for everything to mature a little bit, we don't have any truly unique Laserdiscs, but we obviously have some that are rare and would benefit from a backup sooner rather than later.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä
In that case, I would reach out to the ASAP. The hardware is as mature as it will ever be at this point, and has been stable for the past 4-5 months with no revisions proposed or planned. The entirety of the job at this point is on the software decoding tech. 
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.