Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
It can give dramatic performance benefits with some scientific code. But I'm not sure it's worth the hassle it causes, for example, when users pip install things and it tries to use the Intel compiler to build embedded C/Fortran and gets in a mess.
Good points! I'm most likely being a pedantic jerk, but I have to figure that said scientific code could be just as fast with other compilers, but ICC has better auto-vectorization that obviates the need to do it manually.
There are lots of weird cases in scientific software and at least part of it is that historically fortran support in GCC was very bad (no longer the case, it's arguably better than Intel) so a lot of it is "we've always done with ifort and we don't really trust anything else".
I can't really argue against going with what one is used to. There's a reason why I use TextPad instead of more modern editors, mIRC instead of more modern IRC clients, and GoldWave instead of more modern audio editors. 
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
