What 40 years of 'Space Invaders' says about the 1970s – and today via @TC_Africahttps://theconversation.com/what-40-years-of-space-invaders-says-about-the-1970s-and-today-97518?utm_medium=amptwitter&utm_source=twitter …
-
What's the reason for the player rotating blocks around in Tetris? What's the reason for Pac-Man consuming power pellets? What's the reason for the frog in Frogger to hop across lanes of traffic and a river? What's the reason for knocking out a bunch of bricks in Breakout?
At the time, video games were inherently pointless. You're looking at the technological equivalent of a Rorschach Test and trying to ascribe meaning to it retrospectively. As a game developer, I don't want people like you to be doing that 40 years from now to what I worked on.
-
-
"Players know only that the invaders must be destroyed. It’s a distinct cultural perspective, emphasizing shooting over everything else." Oh, PLEASE. It's not a cultural perspective. It's that games literally didn't have the processing power to have any nuance at all.
-
Or, for that matter, any plot, or any kind of back-and-forth between enemy and foe, short of simple projectiles being sent in one direction or the other. What a sad and uninformed attempt to relate vintage games to modern culture.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.