There is no need for more evidence to conclude that the president withheld United States aid, at least in part, to pressure Ukraine to investigate the Bidens; the House managers have proved this with what they call a “mountain of overwhelming evidence.” 3/15
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
There is no need to consider further the frivolous second article of impeachment that would remove the president for asserting his constitutional prerogative to protect confidential conversations with his close advisers. 4/15
1.447 replies 993 proslijeđena tweeta 5.158 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
It was inappropriate for the president to ask a foreign leader to investigate his political opponent and to withhold United States aid to encourage that investigation. 5/15
1.061 proslijeđeni tweet 3.807 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
When elected officials inappropriately interfere with such investigations, it undermines the principle of equal justice under the law. 6/15
724 proslijeđena tweeta 3.248 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
But the Constitution does not give the Senate the power to remove the president from office and ban him from this year’s ballot simply for actions that are inappropriate. 7/15
3.848 replies 897 proslijeđenih tweetova 4.494 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
The question then is not whether the president did it, but whether the United States Senate or the American people should decide what to do about what he did. 8/15
2.936 replies 696 proslijeđenih tweetova 3.180 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
I believe that the Constitution provides that the people should make that decision in the presidential election that begins in Iowa on Monday. 9/15
2.270 replies 732 proslijeđena tweeta 4.068 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
The Senate has spent nine long days considering this “mountain” of evidence, the arguments of the House managers and the president’s lawyers, their answers to senators’ questions and the House record. 10/15
765 replies 490 proslijeđenih tweetova 2.845 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
Even if the House charges were true, they do not meet the Constitution’s “treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors” standard for an impeachable offense. 11/15
1.351 proslijeđeni tweet 5.975 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
The framers believed that there should never, ever be a partisan impeachment. That is why the Constitution requires a 2/3 vote of the Senate for conviction. Yet not one House Republican voted for these articles. 12/15
1.528 proslijeđenih tweetova 7.087 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit
If it's true AS YOU SAY IT IS, that doesn't make it a partisan impeachment, that makes it a partisan cover up. #RIPGOP
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.