-
-
Replying to @melG679 @TheMarinaTimes and
Seems odd that a highly organized operation TARGETING this particular mailbox, over and over, when there are at least 500,000 more in the city, many of which are in far wealthier locations, is an identity thief. Talk to the post office.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @SubaruTrap @TheMarinaTimes and
They’re targeting those too. Just bc this one is being tweeted about doesn’t mean others aren’t being targeted.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @SubaruTrap @TheMarinaTimes and
The fed can get involved. Though this different from the cases the fed normally deals w when we are talking about mail theft
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @melG679 @SubaruTrap and
But the more correct statement is it’s both a local and fed issue
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @melG679 @TheMarinaTimes and
Except that you have no proof of identity theft. It’s an assumption.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @SubaruTrap @TheMarinaTimes and
I think you need to reread my tweet. 1. Stealing mail is something the DA can prosecute. See Penal Code Sec 530.5(e), which is state, not federal law. 2. I said stealing mail can be serious bc oftentimes it leads to identity theft (also wi the purview of the DA)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @melG679 @SubaruTrap and
Now just to explain things, mail theft fall within the same general penal code section as identity theft (ask yourself logically why someone would steal mail). That assumption put to the side, there are different subsections delineated. Mail theft is a separate crime that the DA
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @melG679 @SubaruTrap and
Can charge. If the evidence is there, the DA can charge BOTH mail theft and identity theft.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
