So, I have pretty thick skin when it comes to online harassment, but something has been really bothering me.
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @gaywonk
Thanks so much for outlining all of this–we’re looking into it further. Sending you a DM now.
1,093 replies 94 retweets 4,573 likes -
Replying to @TeamYouTube @gaywonk
he sells homophobic shirts through your website so don’t strain yourselves trying to figure out if it’s cool
4 replies 17 retweets 930 likes -
Your definition of homophobic is childish
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TheLitBarbarian @LydiaBurrell and
How is this not homophobic?pic.twitter.com/lQMMDTgH8c
2 replies 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @MesacaledJarJar @LydiaBurrell and
Because making fun of =/= phobic. In that case the far left is conservativaphobic. People being offended doesn't dictate a psychological disposition of fear dictating oppressive actions. It's weak minded to think this way.
6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @LugerLynx @MesacaledJarJar and
When used in a psychological context it is always based in an irrational fear. That is the manner in which I use it. If we keep your usage we could apply it to you in reference to conservatives, Christians, and possible white cis males. 1/2
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
I reject the "phobic" usage when applied to insensitivity. I'd be fine with saying it's insensitive. When you can make words means whatever you want (which is what is being done in pop culture), words with actual meaning are cooped to mean something new. So as an insult, meangles
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.