1) Of course she was... That part was obvious.https://twitter.com/GillianHTurner/status/1263154635214372864 …
Show this thread
2) The position of President Obama and Susan Rice is that the White House was unaware of any FBI investigation of Flynn (or the Trump campaign); nor did they have any involvement in directing it to take place.
-
-
3) A day prior to this meeting, DNI James Clapper briefed President Obama on the nature of the call between Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak and Michael Flynn. Clapper received raw “intelligence cuts” about the call from FBI Director Comey & used them to brief President Obama.pic.twitter.com/WE9FMaKV7t
Show this thread -
4) When James Clapper walked directly into the White House with “intelligence cuts”, from the FBI to share with President Obama, it’s likely the legal team around Obama -specifically including Kathryn Reummler- went bananas.
Show this thread -
5) In this context doofus Clapper -with his FBI cuts in hand- just infected the White House with direct knowledge of an ongoing FBI investigation of the incoming administration. In that briefing Clapper removed their carefully assembled plausible deniability.pic.twitter.com/LFuD2L1Dcc
Show this thread -
6) Worse... if anyone should later question FBI Director Comey about it, Comey would say (honestly) he knew Obama was briefed on it because he provided a paper trail. WH counsel Ruemmler would have immediately identified the White House exposure.
Show this thread -
7) That sets up the need for Obama and Rice to organize the pull-aside meeting the following day January 5th. White House needs to put the issue on Comey. Hence Obama telling Comey "by the book" but don't tell me anything.pic.twitter.com/peIyCTQ6Kh
Show this thread -
8) The problem at that point (post meeting) was the risk of it being Obama's word -vs- James Comey. Comey had records, a paper trail, for his escape; the White House did not. It's a he said/he said risk.
Show this thread -
9) So WH Attorney Kathryn Ruemmler tells Susan Rice to create an extemporaneous record of the conversation, in case things go sideways later on. Rice writes the 'memo to file' with objectives for content provided by Ruemmler. /ENDpic.twitter.com/S7F6hHJEO6
Show this thread -
Addendum: The framework and purpose of the Rice 'memo to file' was obvious in the 2018 Rice/Ruemmler response to the Senate.pic.twitter.com/2IQxIyFwuK
Show this thread -
New conversation -
-
-
But shouldn't be president aware of counterintel cases? Specially if they allege that incoming NSA is compromised?
-
Except they should have already closed the Flynn file because they couldn't find any derogatory information...hard to continue that accusation after
@FBI made that official determination.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.