Shame
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But that doesn't mean that the whole paper has been retracted?
-
Yes. No peer review - no publication.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I recall people being skeptical that HCQ would increase mortality by over 30%. Shows the value of just applying intuition sometimes. Adds to the twists and turns of this story...https://twitter.com/firasd/status/1250125344469708801 …
-
Half of Africa wouldn't be here...something was off but...this is the Lancet...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Shame!! a simple retraction won't cut for fraud
-
It cannot be classified as fraud as it stands : it's hard to establish the intention of fraud. Their claims are understandable, even if not scientifically admissible. It could obviously be a pretext, but no evidence for this.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Lancet turned in to this decades ago.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.