This is unmitigated crap. As someone who spent a year on Y2K remediation at a large energy company, let me say you don’t have the first clue what you’re talking about here.
-
-
-
Me too, I was heading this up for Asia Pacific for a bank, team of 380 across 12 countries. What bank spends $65M on a hoax? We modelled what would happen and it wasn't pretty!
- Još 7 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I don’t know about this take Stephen
-
Certainly generated a lot of interesting feedback
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Ah no. Most legacy systems at the time all had some degree of Y2K issues. It was a problem. Was it a fraud? No. Was it real? Yes. Was it overegged? Definitely. The reason nothing happened on Y2K? Because the problems had been preventatively fixed.
- Još 6 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
This is an appallingly bad take on Y2K.
-
I went to the trouble to write a thread on why the article is bollocks, and it contains more information than the article itself. Apologies for that.https://twitter.com/ewster/status/1211158480909783040 …
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
These were the days when we still actually planned & acted on warnings to prevent catastrophe. Now we ignore expert advice, throw our hands up in the air and bleat 'fake news'
-
Better still, a once-respected economist is influencing people to reject expertise.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.