This article was phenomenally awful and I’m sorry this has happened.
In response to today’s Daily Telegraph article, we state that Daniel Johns was not on the premises nor has been previously. We’re unsure of the source of this false information. In our 30 year history, we’ve never revealed the identity of clients and take privacy very seriously.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maybe should have just kept that powder dry until half way through the defamation case, as The Telegraph is vigorously defending it’s story you are called as a witness and crush their entire act. I hear the sound of numbers being punched into a calculator. Lots of zeros.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Well done for sticking to your principles, and I hope that the extra attention leads to extra business for you. And to hell with that soiled rag of a publication.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What an extremely kind thing you did for Daniel Johns. Very classy. Shame it HAS to be done though. Media should be holding terrible government to account, not bullshitting about people that protect their privacy. +1 karma girl.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Who the hell cares
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.