Watch destroy Rolling Stone's propagandistic smear job and its Assange-obsessed author,
Conversation
What a load of bollocks. James is a superb journalist and the story was clear, straight, and backed up with a transcript. Your assertions about narratives and motives are nonsense and show your position rather than any faults on his side.
1
2
Show replies
They published the entire transcript, with audio. Not sure how that's a stitch up? You just shill for despots.
11
It must be nice to have your agenda and stories set for you from the beginning so that you have plenty of time to whine about how everybody's so mean to you 😘
2
By independent news, do you mean rank propaganda for the grift-receptive?
5
So it isn't Roger Waters actually debating the guy. It is Roger Waters monologuing before a sympathetic audience.
3









