U tweetove putem weba ili aplikacija drugih proizvođača možete dodati podatke o lokaciji, kao što su grad ili točna lokacija. Povijest lokacija tweetova uvijek možete izbrisati. Saznajte više
Of all the the opinions in cricket the one I find the most mystifying is thinking running out a batsmen for leaving his crease early is wrong. I just can’t understand the problem. It is clearly an advantage to leave crease early so that should come with an associated risk.
There are a lot of current and former pro cricketers who don’t like it, and I wonder if that comes from all the coaching they have had that insists you “back up” at non strikers end. How many coaches say you should stay in crease until ball bowled?
It’s literally the equivalent of getting stumped. Risk/reward
The reason it is so egregious to me is that it completely takes talent out of the game with the mistake being the deciding factor. I could get out a top class batsman and I haven't an iota of talent. Read any report after a mistake has decided a football match
It's always people who say this who also totally mess up mankads when they attempt it.
I agree we often get over exercised by this in favour of someone who is actually cheating. But re: 'associated risk', if a bowler tries to 'Mankad' a non-striker, but he/she is actually in their crease, what penalty should the bowler's team face?
Noone is cheating. The non striker isn't, the bowler isn't.
In club cricket the problem I've seen is its not clear cut. I can think of 1 bowler in particular who would wait almost freeze just before delivery then go back for the run out as the batsman trotts one or 2 steps forward. Almost Impossible for the batsman in that situation.
Big part of baseball
It saddens me to see Jimmy Anderson being so publicly wrong on this issue
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.
