The pope. Immaculate conception.
-
-
I will debate you on the first any time
For the second, I’m not yet educated enough2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
We could but I've read numerous church father teachings, I've listened to priests from the east and west talk about it. I've watched catechism classes for both East and west on the teachings. You will never convince me of the infallibility of the pope.
5 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Wait How often do you think we believe he’s infallible?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -




1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Is it not church doctrine?https://www.catholic.com/tract/papal-infallibility …
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
“An infallible pronouncement—whether made by the pope alone or by an ecumenical council—usually is made only when some doctrine has been called into question.” This means when speaking “ex cathedra”. I don’t believe the current Pope has EVER done thishttps://www.quora.com/How-many-times-has-the-Pope-spoken-ex-cathedra …
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Rare or common doesn't change the fact that the doctrine is there. It's just not one I can accept. Just like I can't be a Baptist without accepting rapture doctrine. Hence I'm not really a Baptist.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Really this is the doctrine of Christ’s chosen seneschal. To accept this teaching requires the belief that Christ will never allow certain things to be corrupted. If one believes all things can be corrupted, this belief becomes impossible. I can’t reason you into that, my friend
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @TheBrometheus @hmestedpadre and
But I thank you for being open to the hearing.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
To be honest I rejected it myself until I studied the ancient Israelite practice of seneschals. Too many parallels suddenly clicked. That’s what clenched it for me. The rest was faith.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.