Put it another way: If a research team creates a living AI that’s not a series of “If X then Y” triggers but a bottom-up grown intelligence with its own personality and drives so it qualifies as its own entity, can you claim its human creators failed to give it a spirit?
-
-
Show this thread
-
One more angle: If only God can imbue something with true life, the breath of the Spirit, and if a true intelligent being is ever created, what argument against giving that being the full rights and protection of personhood would distinguish it from conceived children?
Show this thread -
These aren’t mere rhetorical musings but important considerations. How comfortable are people with enforcing servile slavery on an intelligent being because it’s origin is murky compared to an organic being? If sex bots for example ever had true intelligence, would that be rape?
Show this thread -
These are questions humanity must puzzle over and find legitimate answers to. The time for these answers being necessary may be fast approaching.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
In my fictional universe, it's at around six weeks. The antagonists use this fact to do terrible things.pic.twitter.com/gPh2sY62K9
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Dude get out of my head.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
1. At the moment of conception. 2. There's never gonna be true A.I.
-
True AI, no longer “artificial”, is exactly the point of this question.
I also doubt it will ever come about, because at that point it would be a genuine life, which would require the will of God since none but Him can fashion a living spirit. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
What do you mean by imbue it with a spirit of life?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.